Control Urban Growth!

"Perpetual growth is the creed of the cancer cell." -- Paul Ehrlich

Kenrick Chin's Page

Kenrick Chin
 

Profile

Hometown:
Dundas, Ont

Comment Wall (3 comments)

You need to be a member of Control Urban Growth! to add comments!

Join this network

At 4:25pm on March 17th, 2008, Kenrick Chin said…
Thanks John for telling me about Herman Daly. I did not take economics in university and it is tips like this that is helping me along on my journey.
At 3:21pm on March 17th, 2008, John Zeger said…
What are you are proposing is called the steady-state economy. It was articlulated very well by economist Herman Daly. When I studied economics in university, everything was presaged upon growth. If there were three quarters of zero growth, it was termed a recession. Now that we are running into our ecological limits on this planet, any economics that is based on endless growth seems foolhardy and archaic. I completely agree with Herman Daly and his argument that we have to abandon any economic model that is based on growth.
At 7:10pm on March 16th, 2008, Kenrick Chin said…
Hi John, Tim, Rick and others

I am new to blogging and making public comments but would like to receive positive or negative feedback on what I have to add.

Every economist, politician, policy maker, corporate manager, etc. that I have listened to all had the same thing to say. They all want to see growth. Here I am not only referring to population growth but also economic growth, GDP, production, profits, deliverables, market share etc. They wring their hands in despair over a paltry 2% growth. They want to see 5%, 8%, 10%.

Simple mathematics tells us that any percentage of growth is an exponential rise. The only thing that changes is the length of time it takes whatever to double. A growth rate of 1% will take 70 years for the population to double while 7% would take 10 years. Any amount of growth is clearly not sustainable. It is just a question of time when we hit the physical limits.

My primary concern here is economic growth and I argue that the reason we experience peaks and valleys in economic activity (what economists like to call "economic cycles") is entirely because we set ourselves up with high expectations with high economic growth, only to have to suffer through times of economic slowdown which occurs as a natural correction.

What is so wrong with a concept of zero growth? I would like to see this as the acceptable norm so that in the long term economic cycles would be straddling above and below this norm, say +2% and -2%. The effect of this would be that population, commerce and the economy would find the appropriate equilibrium level and we would experience smoother economic cycles.
 
 

About Control Urban Growth!

John Zeger John Zeger created this social network on Ning.

Create your own social network!

Control Urban Growth! Badge

Spread the word. Get your own Control Urban Growth! badge for your website or MySpace page. (Get Code)

 

© 2008   Created by John Zeger on Ning.   Create your own social network

Report an Issue  |  Feedback  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service